Champions With Heart.

The Importance of Choosing the Right Team

In a recent decision of the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT), 17-007471 v RBC General Insurance Company (2018 CanLII 83526), the applicant, a pedestrian, was struck by a reversing car in a parking lot.  He suffered whiplash and other injuries, including aggravation of pre-existing shoulder pain.  RBC, his Accident Benefits insurer, determined that his initial injuries fell within the scope of the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).  As a result, his medical benefits were subject to a cap of $3,500. Once the $3,500 was exhausted, the applicant sought additional treatment including ongoing Chiropractic care and a Psychological Assessment.  RBC denied these treatment plans, claiming that no evidence had been provided that the applicant’s ongoing impairments exceeded the definition of a “minor injury” under the MIG (which include a sprain, strain, whiplash associated disorder, contusion, abrasion, laceration or subluxation and any clinically associated sequelae).  The parties were unable to resolve their dispute which led to a hearing in writing.

Read More about The Importance of Choosing the Right Team

What You Need To Know About Our Insurance Act And Car Accidents

Many of you do not know that our legal system is prejudiced against plaintiffs who are injured in car accidents.  In response to pressure from the Insurance industry, our Insurance Act has built-in relief for defendant insurance companies from paying damages to plaintiffs.  Briefly, damages under a certain amount are subject to an automatic deductible which stays in the defendant insurer’s pocket.  So, if a jury awards you $70,000 for pain and suffering, you will only receive $40,000.  The jury is not told that this happens.

Read More about What You Need To Know About Our Insurance Act And Car Accidents