Champions With Heart.

A Campisi Success Story – Motorcycle Accident Case

Mr. Cowdrey was involved in a serious motorcycle accident on September 15, 2013. He was riding alone just after midnight in Innisfil, Ontario when he struck a pothole and was thrown from his motorcycle. He suffered life-threatening injuries including a serious traumatic brain injury and extensive physical injuries including the loss of his left eye. He was airlifted to Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto and placed in a medically induced coma for 2 weeks. As a result of the severity of his injuries, he was deemed catastrophically impaired pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS) under the Insurance Act.

Read More about A Campisi Success Story – Motorcycle Accident Case

Constitutional Challenge Launched Against Flawed Ontario Liberal Government Auto Insurance Legislation- Discriminatory and Unconstitutional

Toronto, January 21, 2015 – Joseph Campisi, lawyer and advocate, is launching a constitutional challenge in the Ontario Superior Courts. Mr. Campisi is seeking a declaration from the courts that parts of the legislation that were recently passed by the Liberal Government are discriminatory and unconstitutional and should be inoperative.

Read More about Constitutional Challenge Launched Against Flawed Ontario Liberal Government Auto Insurance Legislation- Discriminatory and Unconstitutional

ACCIDENT BENEFITS UPDATE: AVIVA BEATS DEAD HORSE… TWICE!

In two recent decisions of the Licence Appeal Tribunal, released on consecutive days, Aviva mounted spirited attempts to broaden the scope of accident benefits claims under the Minor Injury Guideline or MIG. N.R. and Aviva, 2019 CanLII 51313, and the Reconsideration Decision in G.S. and Aviva, 2019 CanLII 51320, were both heard in writing before Vice-Chair Susan Mather released May 9 and 10, respectively. At issue in both was whether the claimant’s chronic pain was a minor injury under the MIG. Historically, Aviva had some success in demonstrating that the presence of chronic pain does not remove a claimant from the MIG unless there is evidence of functional impairment.

Read More about ACCIDENT BENEFITS UPDATE: AVIVA BEATS DEAD HORSE… TWICE!

Accident Benefits Update: Proving Chronic Pain? – a Cautionary Tale

In S.K. v. Aviva Insurance Canada (2019 CanLII 126203) recent Reconsideration Hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT), the applicant S.K. argued that the LAT had erred in fact and at law by finding that her injuries were appropriately treated under the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG). As a result of this finding, her claims for outstanding treatment plans were also dismissed.

Read More about Accident Benefits Update: Proving Chronic Pain? – a Cautionary Tale

Accident Benefits Update: Shades of Grey between Moderate and Marked Impairment

K.S. andTD Home and Auto Insurance Company (2019 CanLII 22189), a recent decision by the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT), considered the fine line for establishing catastrophic impairment (catastrophic) under s.3(2)(f) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule or SABS (prior to June 2016), which deals with Mental and Behavioural Disorders (MBD). The applicant, K.S., was injured on October 28, 2014 while riding his bicycle. He was struck by a passing motorcyclist and flung from his bike, landing on the pavement and splitting his head open. As a result of the accident, K.S. sustained physical injuries to his head, upper body, knees and a fractured neck. He also suffered psychological impairments including poor concentration, irritability, anxiety, stress and depression, as well as uncontrollable and sometimes violent outbursts.

Read More about Accident Benefits Update: Shades of Grey between Moderate and Marked Impairment

COVID-19 Federal and Insurance Assistance for Businesses

As the COVID-19 crisis continues with no end in sight, many of you will face economic hardship and other obstacles that interfere with your ability to run your business. We have prepared this compilation of many the most impactful government relief measures that may be available for you in this time of uncertainty. It is based on our best current information and hopefully will answer some of your questions and offer guidance for further investigation into the benefits available. We will continue to monitor the news for updated information and will try to communicate any important updates promptly. We recommend that you confirm the current status of the measures we describe and review the websites for any other potential sources of assistance the government agencies might offer. As always, we hope that you and your loved ones are safe and are here for you if you have questions or concerns.

Read More about COVID-19 Federal and Insurance Assistance for Businesses

Accident Benefits Update: LAT split on “Reasonable and Necessary” CAT assessments

In V.L. vs. Pafco Insurance Company (2019 CanLII 119760), a recent hearing in writing before the Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT), the applicant, V.L sought payment from Pafco, her insurer for the costs of her assessments to determine catastrophic impairment (catastrophic). Pafco had approved approximately 2/3 of the requested $25,719.25, denying the remaining $8,884.00 on the grounds that these costs were not reasonable or necessary. Two denied Chiropractic treatment plans were also in dispute.

Read More about Accident Benefits Update: LAT split on “Reasonable and Necessary” CAT assessments

Accident Benefits Update: ONCA’s TOMEC Decision on SABS Limitations

On November 8, 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal released Tomec v Economical Mutual Insurance Company (2019 ONCA 882). The central issue on the appeal was whether the two-year limitation to start a proceeding following a denial of accident benefits was a “hard” limitation or was subject to the principle of discoverability.

Read More about Accident Benefits Update: ONCA’s TOMEC Decision on SABS Limitations